

Curbed LA comments on the anger over the cancellation of downtown festivities on New Year’s Eve:
“Just wanted to rant about how Downtown LA can’t throw a fucking new years party if their life depended on it… after years of doing random concerts that never attracted a crowd, Giant Village last year was a moderate success. This year, Giant Village (which had a 6 block section of downtown closed off) had a great lineup and 15,000 people expected. Unfortunately, they didn’t plan for the rain and the thing got cancelled by the fire marshall because people could have gotten electrocuted! Downtown my be a real city center in a few years, but not yet.
Next year, I am up in mammoth snowboarding or at another city that has a real celebration!”
————————–
Doesn’t LA have the world’s suckiest New Years celebration? Mayor Sam agrees. How do we compare to New York, Sydney, Paris or Hong Kong? We need something insanely cool and here is my suggestion:
I have always thought that Los Angeles should prohibit vehicles on the Hollywood Freeway from Barham to Melrose and open it up to pedestrians for a thrilling New Year’s Eve celebration. The city could hang thousands of Chinese lanterns along the highway, and light up the all the 1920’s buildings in Hollywood. Enormous light shows, great bands, and the nearby Red Line would help bring thousands to the celebration. Crowds would walk and promenade on the Freeway and take in those thrilling views that formerly were restricted to 70mph fly-bys.
The same helicopters that fly overhead to report on traffic accidents could monitor the gathering, and the event would attract worldwide attention. California is famous for its freeways, and the idea that they could be transformed into something safe, without drunk driving on New Year’s Eve, is an idea that should be put into practice on New Year’s Eve 2007.
Since the entire world watches the Rose Parade on New Year’s Day, why can’t they watch Hollywood party the night before?