Unemployment and Financial Ruin for Journalists.


As if we needed any confirmation that times are tough for journalists, two stories in the past few days, report on how job losses have decimated the lives of people who worked for magazines and newspapers and now are unemployed.

The Journalism Shop reports “Former Los Angeles Times journalists continue to struggle with severe underemployment, a recent informal survey of 75 former staffers found. Four out of five of the respondents reported earning half — or less — of what they were paid at the Times. Thirteen percent of the respondents reported zero income.”

The New York Times writer David Carr, wrote in an article yesterday, “For those of us who work in Manhattan media, it means that a life of occasional excess and prerogative has been replaced by a drum beat of goodbye speeches with sheet cakes and cheap sparkling wine. It’s a wan reminder that all reigns are temporary, that the court of self-appointed media royalty was serving at the pleasure of an advertising economy that itself was built on inefficiency and excess. Google fixed that.”

His last sentence, whose subject is Google, explains so very much. Google is the force that is destroying free journalism around the world by stealing the work of thousands of men and women who write for a living. Google is perhaps the greatest threat to our freedom since a certain German came to power in 1933.

Why do I write this? Because the work of keeping democratic freedoms alive and viable requires that people remain well informed about what the politicians are doing. By robbing newspapers and magazines of their content, and publishing their content online for free, Google has made it impossible for print media to survive. This is not just a fantasy, it is a visible, measurable and empirically statistical crisis of journalism where one enormous company, worth billions, uses but does not reimburse all the other independent media companies on Earth.

Why is Google allowed to get away with so much merely because it the new technology? Atomic power was the new kid on the block in 1945. Why are we so blind to the dangers of this pernicious, powerful and essentially digital bully?

Sign of the Times.


Trader Joes

One of the great, glib answers given to all job seekers, who are unemployed for any given period of time in Los Angeles, “Just get a job at Trader Joes”.  As their website states: “There are currently no jobs”.

Culver City Mazda.


Culver City Mazda.

Photo: Here in Van Nuys

Very soon, sooner than we might imagine, there will most likely be hundreds of dealerships, all over California, whose vast acreage will be emptied.

People are simply not buying or leasing as many cars. Auto companies are not producing. There is a depression in the car industry.

What can we do with the leftover land underneath these closed dealerships?

I wish that these enormous plots of oil soaked asphalt, which once existed and thrived as a testament to our voracious hunger for cars, would somehow be converted back to orange groves or some agricultural use.

Culver City has a wonderful farmers market, that comes here Tuesday afternoon. What if this “progressive” city were to tear up this defunct auto dealership and plow its asphalt into dirt and grow organic fruits and vegetables here?

Humans will always need to eat. Our appetite for the gasoline powered automobile is not eternal.

Van Nuys Con Artists Prey on Economic Fears.


From the Los Angeles Times

Consumer fraud charges filed against five Van Nuys companies

The cases are part of a federal crackdown dubbed Operation Short Change. The FTC says the firms allegedly made $300 million by selling fraudulent programs related to real estate or online businesses.

By Jim Puzzanghera

July 2, 2009

Reporting from Washington — The recession has killed jobs by the millions, but it’s been a boon to one sector of the population: con artists.

They’ve been offering consumers help in repairing bad credit, landing new jobs, starting lucrative work-at-home businesses and obtaining government money to pay off bills. These scams — which are surging along with the jobless rate — are touted on websites and infomercials, and have bilked consumers out of hundreds of millions of dollars, said David C. Vladeck, director of the Federal Trade Commission’s Bureau of Consumer Protection.

Federal officials, working with authorities in California and other states, struck back Wednesday. They announced a series of civil and criminal charges against alleged con artists who have preyed on economic anxiety to lure consumers into making upfront payments for services that either fall far short of the promises or never materialize.

“Rising unemployment, shrinking credit, record-setting foreclosures and disappearing retirement accounts are causing consumers tremendous anxiety about making ends meet,” Vladeck said Wednesday at a news conference at the FTC. “But to con artists, today’s challenging economy presents an opportunity to exploit consumers’ fears and bilk them out of money.”

Vladeck said that more than 100 cases have been filed nationwide this year as part of Operation Short Change, a task force consisting of the FTC, the Department of Justice and officials in 13 states and the District of Columbia. The cases included eight filed Wednesday by the Federal Trade Commission.

One of the FTC’s new cases alleged that five Van Nuys companies had bilked consumers out of about $300 million by selling fraudulent programs related to real estate or online businesses.

The companies — John Beck Amazing Profits, John Alexander, Jeff Paul, Mentoring of America and Family Products — and five people who had founded or run those companies were accused of violating federal laws related to telemarketing and consumer fraud.

The FTC accuses the companies of making “false and unsubstantiated claims about potential earnings” that customers could make by following their advice in books, CDs and DVDs titled “John Beck’s Free & Clear Real Estate System,” “John Alexander’s Real Estate Riches in 14 Days” and “Jeff Paul’s Shortcuts to Internet Millions,” which were sold for $39.95 each.

People who purchased the programs, advertised through infomercials, unknowingly were signed up for additional monthly charges of $39.95 and offered “personal coaching services” that cost several thousand dollars.

Messages left at the companies’ offices were not returned Wednesday.

In another case, Beverly Steward, a single, unemployed mother of two from the Washington, D.C., area, answered a newspaper advertisement in January for a cleaning position. She was referred to another company, Job Safety USA, and paid $98 for a certification allowing her to handle hazardous materials.

The documents never came, and Steward soon realized she had been taken, she said.

“The website looked great. Anybody would have fallen for it,” said Steward, who pursued complaints with several government agencies. “I don’t want anybody else . . . to be taken for even 5 cents.”

The FTC sought a court injunction last week against Job Safety USA, its owner, Walter Ramos Borges, and five other Maryland-based companies linked to him for unfair and deceptive practices as well as restitution for customers. Borges and the companies could not be located for comment.

The California Department of Corporations, which oversees investment advisors and other financial services businesses, has filed 13 cease-and-desist orders related to Operation Short Change, mostly against people operating payday loan businesses without licenses. North Carolina has brought the most cases, 19.

“For a con artist, a bad economy is like a gold rush,” North Carolina Atty. Gen. Roy Cooper said at Wednesday’s news conference. Consumer complaints in his state have surged 27% this year, he said.

Complaints to the FTC about business opportunities, such as work-at-home offers, nearly doubled in 2008 over the previous year to 20,286 and are continuing to rise in 2009. In the first six months of this year, the credit counseling and debt management category accounted for 3,600 complaints filed with the FTC, nearly triple the 1,300 complaints filed in the first half of 2008.

California Atty. Gen. Jerry Brown’s office has seen the monthly average number of consumer complaints jump from 1,900 in 2008 to 3,000 so far this year, said spokeswoman Christine Gasparac. In June, the office set a record with 3,622 complaints.

Cooper said consumers should not pay money upfront for any such services. But he said that con artists have found fruitful territory in the recession.

“Families in desperate need of cash often let their guard down, a gold mine for scammers,” he said.

The FTC advises consumers to visit its Money Matters website, which offers tips and videos about avoiding scams fueled by the economic downturn.

jim.puzzanghera@latimes.com

Building Blocks.


Mid-Century Modern
Mid-Century Modern
Van Nuys Blvd
Van Nuys Blvd

If you walk around Van Nuys, you encounter unexpectedly graceful and forgotten pieces of architecture.

I noticed this white bricked office building, most likely constructed in the early 1960s. This is the type of structure that would excite an architect in Silver Lake, and one could imagine a young firm setting up shop here. Instead, the building sits underutilized, begging for tenants.

Along Van Nuys Boulevard, just south of Vanowen, is a two-story commercial building, the kind they built in the late 1940s, with steel casement windows and retail space on the ground floor. This might have originally been an optometrist’s office on top, a respectable location for a doctor or perhaps a CPA. If this building were on Rowena and Hyperion it would be a cheese shop, an art gallery or maybe a Cuban cafe. Instead, it sits empty on Van Nuys Boulevard.

It takes some vision and guts to imagine that the failures of Van Nuys can be reversed and that this down and out and street may once again have vibrant commerce, cleanliness and vitality. I do fervently believe that the future of Los Angeles will once again come down to these old, neglected places.

I can see a Van Nuys Boulevard where a light rail system runs down the middle and the street is lined with thriving cafes, apartments and small businesses. I imagine a place where the ugly cobra lights have been dismantled and replaced with decorative lampposts. A Van Nuys where there are cops walking the beat, and people waving hello to their neighbors.

Where are the visionaries? Where is the money that is sitting tightly in the banks, which should be invested in this very community?

And why is there such a paucity of the imagination in changing and rebuilding the real Los Angeles? Why are our politicians and leaders like old clunkers in Detroit, waiting for the federal government to bail us out, when we have the resources and money and to do the work ourselves?

The old buildings are visible reminders that, not so long ago, Van Nuys had optimists who believed in and built up the future of this area.
They came here to create, not to retreat.

Can the Rich Make it?


Photo by Andy Hurvitz March 2009 Studio City, CA.
Photo by Andy Hurvitz
March 2009
Studio City, CA.

Can the Rich Make it?, originally uploaded by here in van nuys.

For the past decade, this domestic scene was unremarkable.

An enormous modern home with a three-car garage.

Somehow we imagined that this was attainable and desirable.

The market goes down and down and nobody know where it will settle.

Speculation in stocks and housing has now proven to be good for very few, and a losing scam for millions more.

So, one has to wonder: can the rich make it?