The Valley is an Island.


LA Weekly has an article which discusses how a half cent sales tax increase, to support public transportation projects, which may be built in sections of Los Angeles, other than the San Fernando Valley, is angering the San Fernando Valley.

If the sales tax is approved this month for placement on the November ballot by the state Legislature and Arnold Schwarzenegger — and that question is up in the air as chaos unfolds over the budget in Sacramento — and if voters approve it this fall, the new sales tax would raise $40 billion over 30 years.

Most of the grandest projects would serve the Westside and South Los Angeles: $1 billion to build the Expo light-rail line from downtown to Santa Monica; $235 million for the vaguely defined Crenshaw Transit Corridor; nearly $1 billion to partially build a Subway to the Sea.

Opposition comes from such SFV power brokers as the DAILY NEWS and the Sherman Oaks Homeowners Association.

The Valley’s history of getting shortchanged is also coloring its leaders’ suspicions — again. Until this spring, Ron Kaye was editor of the Valley-based Daily News, who often focused his editorials on a downtown-centric City Hall that chronically drains the outlying areas to spend the money elsewhere.

The last time Valley residents backed a similar sales-tax increase, in fact, City Hall politicians promised sweeping transit fixes for the Valley. Instead, Kaye says, “At the Daily News, there was a tabulation that the Valley had paid $2 billion to $3 billion [toward local transit projects] and had gotten a $300 million busway” for its troubles. That busway, the Orange Line, is already groaning at full capacity.

What is all the “anger” really about? Power. Small fry papers and homeowners associations need a rallying point to bring people together and “defeat” projects that would ultimately benefit all of greater Los Angeles. These local entities survive and thrive on NIMBY political provincialism which pits one section of the city against another.

The garishly prosperous neighborhood of Sherman Oaks is one of the least suffering areas of Los Angeles in terms of health care, housing, education and conveniences. Yes, it sits under the same blanket of smog that chokes East Los Angeles, but imagine that there is actually resentment here that a crummy half cent tax might allow Los Angeles to finally build a real train from downtown to the ocean.


“They promise the Valley great transit lines, and then they build them in other areas,” says Richard Close, president of the Sherman Oaks Homeowners Association and a former leader of the Valley secession movement. “Unless you have a Valley government, we get nothing. We get crumbs. This is just another indication of it.”

Oh, the horror of it! Yes, we need to take the Valley out of Los Angeles and pull away further from the rest of the city and stop robbing the good folks of Encino, Sherman Oaks and Studio City by funding projects that might reduce the number of cars sitting on the 101 and 405. Stop that sales tax because the wheels of my car never travel south of Mullholland…..

In Our Dreams…..


Mr. Koo works near Olympic and Bundy and lives in Van Nuys. A distance of 14 miles.It took him 90 minutes to get home last night. That means he was traveling at an average rate of 6 miles an hour.

There is a critical need to expand the feeble range of the LA Metro Subway system.

It seems that there is now at least an understanding that Angelenos need a CHOICE, whether or not to ride a train from downtown to Beverly Hills and then to Santa Monica.

We live in 2008. This is not 1985, 1965 or 1945. The old mentality of “Everyone loves their cars” combined with “Only maids rides buses” is fast giving way to the reality that many maids drive cars, and many physicians would like to get to work faster by riding a train.

I don’t love my car. I love my life, and I love being able to get somewhere fast without sitting in traffic and contributing to the meltdown of our planet with fossil fuels.

L.A. Manhattanizing? We Did it Better 75 Years Ago.


Photos: USC Digital Archives

“Los Angeles, the first great modern metropolis with multiple urban cores, seems determined to remake its urban DNA — and fashion itself, to one degree or another, in the image of New York City. Bruce B. Brugmann, the populist publisher of the San Francisco Bay Guardian, coined the term “Manhattanization” in the 1970s to describe just what we’re seeing. Broadly speaking, it refers to a vertical urbanism in which the entire city serves as a bedroom for a dominant urban core that is chock-full of cultural attractions. Density is a premium value in a successfully Manhattanized city, producing economies of scale, extraordinary concentrations of skills and an entertaining street scene. Human activities are more important than sunlight, nature or individual privacy.”

-Joel Kotkin, “Why the Rush to Manhattanize L.A?”, Los
Angeles Times, August 12, 2007

Joel Kotkin has argued before that Los Angeles is unique in its car-centered, single family home, sunshine and backyard design. He decries those who would turn us towards a denser city, with pedestrian friendly shops, walking and public transit.

His recent L.A. Times article conjures up a city enthralled to big money developers who, in alliance with a sympathetic mayor, are planning and building a downtown that will resemble Manhattan.

But look at these 1930s images from the USC Digital Archives! They truly show a city that aspired, in its art deco buildings, to emulate Gotham. There are 10-story apartment houses that most likely housed middle class people, who enjoyed a clean, urbane and civilized city with parks, shops and restaurants within walking distance. Anyone who desired to go to the beach, could hop a Red Car and ride out to Venice!

1930’s Los Angeles was all about development and making money, just like today. But the city also encouraged, not only single family housing, but a variety of forms that allowed people to both own a car and walk to work. We are too crowded today, to imagine that a city of all cars and houses, where everyone drives, could possibly function well.

We will never be Manhattan. But we can be a little less LA as we try and build a better city.

Walkscore.com


.flickr-photo { border: solid 2px #000000; }.flickr-yourcomment { }.flickr-frame { text-align: left; padding: 3px; }.flickr-caption { font-size: 0.8em; margin-top: 0px; }


Dusk on Sepulveda., originally uploaded by Here in Van Nuys.

A friend sent me a link to site called “Walkscore.com“. You enter an address and the computer determines how “walkable” the neighborhood is. How close your home is to essential services that you might get to on foot, rather than by auto, this is the point.

Well my little pocket near Sepulveda and Victory scored 77 out of 100 because I am so close to so much that I want to walk to. (Ha!) It’s true in some cases: I am within walking distance to a video store, two banks, Jiffy Lube, a car wash, Dunn-Edwards and Arco, McDonalds, and about four Mexican restaurants and bakeries.

Then why is it that I never have the desire to stroll around Sepulveda and Victory at night, the way I might if I lived in Old Pasadena or Hancock Park?

And what other kind of people are in my neighborhood who do all their business on their platform heeled feet?

Today’s MTA Experience.


So I was boarding my train at the North Hollywood station today around 9am. I sat down, while the train was parked, and could see two Sheriffs questioning a baggy pants wearing black man on a platform bench. They wanted to see his ticket. The man fumbled through his backpack, with deliberate slowness, and finally produced something that did not seem to satisfy law enforcement. So they handcuffed him.

At the same time, in my train car, a vagrant had his feet up on the seat. An MTA employee walked up to him and said loudly, “Sir, get your feet off the seat! Or I will throw you off the train!” When the man refused, the MTA clerk pulled the brake of the train, and summoned a deputy into the car. The deputy spoke to the vagrant and the man complied. Then the clerk said to the vagrant, “I’m putting you on Camera #25 so rest assured that you are being watched! Next time I ask you to take your feet off the seat, you had better listen!”

While it’s reassuring to see some law enforcement return to the MTA after months of watching vandalism rise, I now observe how rudely the officials treat the riding public. These are the mostly minority riders of LA public transit. They are spoken to, like misbehaving children, with a sneering contempt. But I respect the challenges of patrolling this system and the frustration of seeing how people behave. Tough love they call it, right?

But now I’m on the other side. I ride to work along with Maria, Carlos, Jose and Shewanna. We are the braceros.

I see now how a badge sees them.

WIder Sidewalks Downtown?


.flickr-photo { border: solid 2px #000000; }.flickr-yourcomment { }.flickr-frame { text-align: left; padding: 3px; }.flickr-caption { font-size: 0.8em; margin-top: 0px; }

Los Angeles Downtown News has an article about how the planning commission might adopt new standards to mandate wider (15 feet v. 10 feet) sidewalks downtown.

“Observers say it signals a push by the Planning Department not only to promote the pedestrian-friendly vision extolled by Planning Director Gail Goldberg, but to proactively affect development – and to remain relevant in the city’s pursuit of smart growth.

Goldberg has repeatedly called for her department to consider projects with pedestrians, not automobiles, in mind. The move to establish new guidelines also represents a milestone for the Department’s Urban Design Studio, launched late last year and charged with turning many of the talking points into action.”

Wider sidewalks allow for restaurant tables and chairs, as well as trees and pedestrians to co-exist. Probably the greatest obstacle to the transformation of downtown Los Angeles is its “Blade Runner” environment of blank marble walls, tunnels, overhead bridges, and moonscape freeways that were rammed through in the 1950s and 60s. The Reagan Era added homeless human beings to the toxic and inhumane mix.

Not only downtown, but throughout Los Angeles, the city should narrow the boulevards and widen the walkways. Plant trees and make the human heart & lungs, not the carburetor, our number one priority.