New York City: 1983
In a recent post about why the LA Times is underachieving its readership and investors, John Stodder asks if the problem lies not with the paper, but with the city of Los Angeles itself:
“Something’s gone out of Los Angeles — confidence, a sense of identity, a belief in the future. A thriving newspaper is, at some level, a product of boosterism. Los Angeles has a lot of paid advocates, but few boosters. That’s a big change, historically.
Los Angeles has had a tough couple of decades since the triumph of the 1984 Olympic Games. Once upon a time, we accepted progress as a given. Nowadays, we accept decline and the intractability of our problems. Schools, traffic, housing costs, the environment — who is telling us these things can get better? Well, sure, lots of people say so, especially when there’s an election coming up. But who really believes?”
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
But how horrible are things in LA anyway? Is the situation so dire and awful?
In the 1970’s and 80’s, New York City was in decline as Los Angeles is today. The New York Times sat in the midst of a slum called “Times Square” and said absolutely nothing about the appalling condition of the district which it gave birth to. Newspapers do not take a lead in cleaning up a city, nor should they become “boosters” of the area that they serve. Their job is to report the events around them in an objective and realistic way. If the Times becomes the biggest megaphone lauding a revival of Los Angeles, then it will cease to be a credible newspaper.
However, Mr. Stodder is dead on correct in stating that this city lacks a confidence and vision. The events of life here seem to take place in a fun house of extremes: either people shooting each other in the street or the red carpet premiere. We see men and women eating out of garbage cans on Ventura Boulevard as $80,000 SUV’s plow down the street. There is great cruelty in Los Angeles. Yet 40 or 50 years ago, it was a progressive city with fantastic schools, a growing economy and a sense that it was leading the world in technology, music, and something called leisure time.
But look at the 1983 photos of New York City. Is LA that bad? If they can pull themselves back up from the bottom……..



















You must be logged in to post a comment.