The fire ravaged hills of Pacific Palisades and Altadena not only cry out for rebuilding. But cry to rebuild in a better way.
Especially in Pacific Palisades, the only way back (as imagined by those in power) is to rebuild the gargantuan single family home. How these can be afforded, let alone insured, is the new mystery of 2025, for very few will want to spend the next decade constructing McMansions that may burn down in the next fire.
Insurers are fleeing California, as the pool of “safe” properties dwindles, and the rates they can charge are understandably limited. A low cost insurance would not even replace a burned down tool shed.
And then there are the philosophical and political battles raging from those who only want luxury housing to those who believe it is a moral imperative to provide a percentage of “affordable” housing to Angelenos.
Somewhere in the middle is the moderate case to be made for developments that mix commercial and residential in the same walkable community. For here, there may be defensible lines for firefighters to use to battle the next conflagration. Up in the hills, next to the wild lands, is where the greatest danger lies.
The safer alternative is a denser community of pleasant surroundings with apartments and homes near stores, and walkable streets with cafes, restaurants, hardware, shoe repair and bookstores. Yes, we have to make room for Lululemon, Alo and skin clinics, but they should not occupy the entirety of every single commercial space.
There should be a plan for rebuilding in an architecturally coherent way, one that actually puts living residential spaces above the stores along the sidewalk, rather than fake windows as one sees in The Grove and Disneyland.
And if a plan is selected, it should be in styles that evoke what made old California beautiful.
What follows are imagined architectural designs for rebuilt fire zones in Pacific Palisades and Altadena.



































You must be logged in to post a comment.