The Opulent Era: R.I.P.


Joan’s on Third, originally uploaded by ann-dabney.

I ate lunch at Joan’s on Third today, a place that I consider a really excellent food emporium, redolent of New York, with opulent sandwiches, delicious desserts, gorgeous women and so many cupcakes.

But on a walk, after lunch, we passed store after store that was going out of business, or had everything on sale. Many businesses had closed, and you could smell the death of so many small stores that once thrived on this most trivial and fashionable of streets.

Only yesterday, it seems, there were people who shopped here that could afford $80 candles and fine china for their dogs. This was the district with the slickest independent clothing designers, the hippest furniture, the coolest shoes.

Privately, I thought of this area as a staging grounds for post-collegiate poseurs and those young people whose parents paid for their apartments, and subsidized the BMWs that are so ubiquitous here.
The sidewalks were full of those prematurely cynical and dark haired people, from Scarsdale, Bethesda, Winnetka and Short Hills, the young writers and liberal arts majors who “work” in entertainment or some other bloodsucking non-entity. They were part of the clientele who supported these inane but once successful businesses: purveyors of balloons, flowers, perfumes, candles, and glass paper weights.

It was fun, wasn’t it, to drop $200 on professional hair color and $100 for a salt scrub body massage? How many $8 chocolate bars did you buy today? This was the ethos of 3rd Street.

But The Market has lost 50% of its value in one year, and the smart minds who got into the right places, like Wall Street and real estate, have been brought down by the collapse of prosperity. Some of the successful earners in the evil industries supported the artsy ambitions of the lowly paid creatives and now the green water spigot is dry.

I am not one of those positive people, who believe that we will merely stimulate a military based economy whose characteristics are so corrupt and unjust that it defies rationalization. We are attempting a government bailout of every single institution that once seemed solid and powerful: finance, banking,automobiles, property values and government itself. The nation that partied and celebrated itself into a drunken indebtedness is still intoxicated on denial.

People are watching their money, the same people who dropped into Brite Smile to have their teeth whitened for $800; the same folks who stayed at the Beverly Wilshire one night just for the hell of it; the Jimmy Choo crowd who thought $500 was reasonable for a pair of shoes. They are all scared shitless.

Want to see something very frightening?

Just take a walk down once cheery 3rd Street, where the credit cards and cash have blown away like so much garbage on skid row. The stores are closing, and may be gone for a generation.

Obama, Spending, Sprawl, Infrastructure…… and David Brooks.



Conservative writer David Brooks now critiques Obama’s potential infrastructure investment plans for their lack of imagination:

“It would be great if Obama’s spending, instead of just dissolving into the maw of construction, would actually encourage the clustering and leave a legacy that would be visible and beloved 50 years from now.

To take advantage of the growing desire for community, the Obama plan would have to do two things. First, it would have to create new transportation patterns. The old metro design was based on a hub-and-spoke system — a series of highways that converged on an urban core. But in an age of multiple downtown nodes and complicated travel routes, it’s better to have a complex web of roads and rail systems.

Second, the Obama stimulus plan could help localities create suburban town squares. Many communities are trying to build focal points. The stimulus plan could build charter schools, pre-K centers, national service centers and other such programs around new civic hubs.

This kind of stimulus would be consistent with Obama’s campaign, which was all about bringing Americans together in new ways. It would help maintain the social capital that’s about to be decimated by the economic downturn.

But alas, there’s no evidence so far that the Obama infrastructure plan is attached to any larger social vision. In fact, there is a real danger that the plan will retard innovation and entrench the past.”

But alas, Mr. Brooks, what you don’t understand is that Mr. Obama was elected not on his specifics, but for his slogans, and any specificity regarding his new programs will be withheld for as long as possible.

6 bedrooms, 3 baths, 3300 sq ft: $449,000


In prestigious Grosse Point Farms, MI, just a block or two from the lake, is this lovely home…..

…….which costs less than most homely, tacky, tiny houses in Lake Balboa.

Showing that there is a direct correlation between economic prosperity and house prices, even the finest suburban areas near Detroit are fast becoming cheap places to invest in.

AT&T’s Phone Scam Offer.



One of the characteristics of modern American life is that on the surface things seem so slick, easy, good, and technological.

But the hucksters, the old tricksters, are always with us….

Take the mobile phone for instance. I have my “plan” with the new AT&T (formerly Cingular, vaguely Yahoo) and along with my bundled home phone, I also have DSL. I have been with this company of many names for about four years.

An offer arrived at my house last week in the mail. It promised a new Nokia 6085 camera phone for FREE if I activated another line of service.

I actually do need another mobile phone line for another person in my family, so I called AT&T. They offered:

• To rollover my minutes
• Send me a free phone
• Put me on a $69.99 “family plan”

After spending about 15 minutes with the rep, she gave me several choices of a new number and then verified my order by reciting the new number. It had a 6-2-6 area code and I live in 8-1-8. I asked her if she could change it, and she said that she could not.

She had just created a new line of service for me, picking a new number for me that she claimed she could not change.

So I called back and got another rep. This one said he would be glad to change it. He also told me he would send me a “better” phone, one with text messaging built in. I told him I just wanted an 8-1-8 area code and the original phone.

So he went ahead and created an entirely new service order, along with a new telephone number and a new telephone. But he did not cancel the erroneous 6-2-6 order and forthcoming delivery from the first bad call. He also assigned me an 8-1-8 number without asking me which seven digit number following the area code I might prefer.

He claimed that he could not give me choices, when the previous operator had given me several choices. He was lying.

He claimed he had “changed” the 6-2-6 to 8-1-8 when all he had done was add another number to my order. He was lying.


I was now due to receive TWO TELEPHONES with TWO DIFFERENT NUMBERS.

And he told me he could not cancel the order. I was locked into this.

These two reps were eager to implement my order, so that they could collect THEIR REWARDS, but ignored my own needs. They also lied to me, by claiming that they could not change something they could.

Today I reached “Christian” in San Antonio, TX at the secondary sales group and he rescinded the entire order. He apologized for the mistakes. He was courteous and helpful.

But the people last night belong in the category of scam artists. AT&T treated me like I was calling up an Internet porn company in Nigeria. It was a scam, meant to boost sales, and reward con artists.

This Is What It’s Like to Buy Houses… Or Not Buy Them


Photo: UCLA Library, Digital Collections, “New Houses in Van Nuys”, April 13, 1948

Joe Dungan from The Simon writes:

“Picture it: A young married couple is looking to get out of their North Hollywood apartment and buy their first house. They find a nice middle-class house in a decent neighborhood in Van Nuys with two bedrooms, a den, one-and-a-half bathrooms, and a detached garage.

They offer $12,000 for it. And their bid is accepted.

This is what happened to my parents in Van Nuys in 1967, before they divorced, before that part of Van Nuys became a bit dodgy, and before real estate increased about 4,800% in value. If you still think nostalgia is for assholes, then you have no soul.

I bring this up only because the cost of housing is something we used to bring up all the damn time here. But it comes up in conversation less and less these days, probably because it is as much of a reality of life here as the traffic. And the reality is a beautiful one for people who own a place and a hideous one for those who don’t.

At this point, you may be wondering what I’m saying that isn’t true about the rest of the country. First of all, it’s not true about the rest of the country. In some cities, housing prices are as stagnant as fashion trends of a cattle rancher. (Ever hear anyone telling you to get in on a great real estate deal in Detroit?)

Second of all, prices are more exaggerated here than in other “hot” markets. Sixteen of the one hundred most expensive zip codes are in our county. The median home price is $545,000, putting Los Angeles fourth in the nation. One study cited Los Angeles as the least affordable housing market in the nation, stating that a grand total of two percent of the homes are affordable for residents making median incomes.

There is one figure that astonishes me most. Consider that, depending on the personal finance expert you talk to, one should spend 25 to 33 percent of one’s income on one’s mortgage. In Los Angeles, the average is 62 percent, putting it far ahead of that of any other city.

In the twisted world of real estate, the demand that shot prices up also forced many of us out of the buying market. So, in addition to a huge number of people racing to buy homes, another huge number of people took shelter in the rental market, driving up rents as well. Today, the twelve grand that my parents spent for ownership of an entire house in (what was then) a very decent neighborhood gets you a year’s rent in a small apartment in a marginal neighborhood.

So not only are pre-2000 buyers basking in the good fortune of buying something that doubled in value in five years, but even renters of the era are considered lucky. I was fortunate enough to get into a nice apartment in 2001 that was run by a guy who didn’t realize just how much he could be asking for his vacant units. As the years go on, people register more and more astonishment when I tell them just how little I’m paying for my place, and how rent-control laws will forever dampen my annual rent increases. Despite the purported illogic of renting, I’m very reluctant to give up my inexpensive flat unless I’m absolutely certain I won’t be returning. Nice apartments this cheap are nearly as extinct as $12,000 houses in Van Nuys.”

What People Earn.


Being a “temporaily” unemployed writer, I have had to scrounge around and look for job opportunities. One of those desperate moments is when I register with an agency, and submit to hours of testing on my MS Word, Excel and “Numbers” skills. The last category is when you have to type the same number in a box that is above the empty box on the monitor screen.

These employment agencies are as depressing as a hospital, nursing home or the DMV. They are usually windowless, flourescent lit evironments staffed by very fat women. These mediocrities sit at a desk and assess you in the narrowest and least imaginative way. “Let’s see. Do you know Vista? Because if you do, I can place you at Atlantis Motels in Reseda and they need a front desk greeter for $12 an hour!”

There is no accounting for the strange ways of wealth in Los Angeles. People you think are rich, might be broke, but lease a $700 a month BMW and live in Beverly Hills. The millionaires next door, actually are on my street, here in Van Nuys. They live behind gates and own acres of land in one of the largest retail developments in the Mid-Wilshire district.

An investment banker in New York, who dresses so stylishly that his custom made suits were noticed by Ralph Lauren, recently wrote me to ask if he should give up his job and try moving to LA because he is “creative” and wants to work in film or do “something” in design. He probably makes at least $500,000 a year and perhaps he has some savings and can make a go of it here in LA.

But imagine the day that his savings run out, and he has to walk into the musty offices of Apple One in Glendale and submit to a typing test. Maybe he only can turn out 30 WPM. The fat lady with the donuts and generic hand moisturizer bottle at Apple One will look at him with bewilderment and say, “But what are your SKILLS?” He will walk out of there and down the street and buy a plot at Forest Lawn just in case…….